I think I'll summarise:

1) We talked about a conseptual scheme, you suggested the sixth sence was it, I said 'I don't think so' but lets still aknowledge it. So: 'we have a way of looking at things' - a conseptual scheme.

2) We talked about 'god' you said that perhaps god was absolute truth, I said: 'maybe, but absolute truth is not got therefore, god and absolute truth may share attributes, but they are not the same. God would have to be more, or maybe even less than absolute truth.'

3) We talked about love and possibly religion as a way to excape the conseptual scheme, and possibly the universe.

Now I'm goig to link our idea of a conseptual scheme with teh idea of entity we cam up with ages ago, the conceptual scheme is part of our entity.

So our model of ouselves:

Entity = conseptual scheme + emotional state + whatever else.

now I wonder weather our emotional system/state is actually part of our conseptual scheme. The reason I pose this is that from our past discussions we desided that some facters effected our emotional model, so works much like our filter/conseptual scheme.

This would suggest:

Entity = conseptual scheme + whateve else.

Now when I think about it, what is the difference between entity and conseptual scheme? I think it has something to do with time and experience. At any one time we have our conseptual scheme, but because we exist though time we are more. We are different one day from the next, it's not JUST that out conseptual scheme  has altered, although I'm sure it has, it's more. Or so I think. Assuming this the entity = conseptual scheme + what has happend (that's our exp.) 

Well I feel that has re-engaged me.

 -Lucas.